SOCIOPATHOCRACY
For
all practical purposes, much of the world now lives under sociopathocracy:
government by sociopaths. The globalist superelite consists of generations
of sociopaths who are raised from childhood to see themselves as superior
to the human cattle whose livelihoods they destroy with no more thought
than one of us would give to kicking over an anthill, whether from the
wars they foment to the economic dislocations their corporations create.
Sociopaths clearly dominate Europe and have for decades; today, they
impose “austerity” on their masses, as the latter pay the
costs of the destructive policies of their governments and banking leviathans.
Sociopaths permeate our political class and its enforcement subordinates,
extending from the White House and Congress on down to your county and
city officials who get their jollies from destroying the life of an
Andrew Wordes. The sociopathocracy gets support from those in the larger
portion of that opportunistic 15 percent remainder who identify with
authority and don’t mind helping destroy a man’s life to
advance their own standing with the powers-that-be.
In
my book Four Cardinal Errors I argue that the third of the
errors there documented was the replacement of Christianity as a societal
worldview with materialism as a societal worldview. According to materialism
the whole of reality is just physical reality; the
universe is just physical entities in motion, uncreated, and—on
the largest scale—of no moral significance. Human life, in this
case, ceases to have transcendent moral significance; it has no moral
significance beyond what we can give it, in this life which lasts less
than an instant given the vast expanse of cosmic time.
The
individual dies; the state and corporations, however, go on. Those in
power answer to no One Higher than each other, or themselves. Human
beings are just language-using animals who occasionally speak the language
of morality, which has no transcendent source or grounding. The best
such moral codes are likely to produce is preference utilitarianism:
pursue the greatest amount of pleasure for the greatest number, while
letting everyone decide for themselves what gives them pleasure. These
ideas begin with intellectuals who play influential roles in universities
and in government. Variations on them or applications of them have received
support from large corporations or tax-exempt foundations such as Rockefeller.
Eventually they reach the public via cultural osmosis. Materialistic
ideas are embodied in literature, in popular songs (think of Madonna’s
“Material Girl”), in art, and eventually built into the
framework of education which, by this time, is far more about the social
engineering of compliance. When enough people are operational materialists—their
being “Sunday Christians” will do!—we have a materialistic
society, the main focus of which is on the pleasures of the present
and how best to maximize them. Some of these pleasures turn out to be
personally and socially destructive, of course, and so the culture begins
to crumble from the inside out. When unbridled greed dominates the financial
world, efforts to accumulate massive amounts of wealth grow increasingly
reckless until they threaten economic stability. Then, unfortunately,
and only then, do people begin to look up from their couches and ask
questions.
Materialism
by itself doesn’t give us sociopaths, of course, but a materialistic
society, in combination with the anonymity noted above, tends to work
against the moral compass of its people, rendering persons and institutions
vulnerable to sociopaths. As the sociopathic mindset controls more and
more of the warp and woof of society, morality and honesty consistently
work against a person, who eventually grows cold and cynical himself.
Regrettably,
many libertarians have fallen into some variation of this philosophical
cul-de-sac, arguing that reason requires rejection of God and
other transcendent realities, and that liberty requires only
a rejection of the initiation of force, and not the purposeful application
of principles (e.g., the objective worth of the individual person) the
only possible grounding of which is in a transcendent reality. Sociopaths
know how to exploit naïve secular philosophies. They instinctively
recognize their cardinal weaknesses, such as the absence of any injunction
against sacrificing the few to benefit the many (as happened in the
ghastly Tuskegee
Experiment). As sociopaths rise to power this gets turned around
to sacrificing the many to benefit the few with the most money and power!
In the end, under materialism there is no means of keeping sociopaths
from accumulating power. The telos of materialism, one might say, is
a totally controlled society under a totalitarian corporate-state.
Arguably,
sociopathocracy has become a dominant mindset within the country—whether
we are talking about government or large corporations, especially the
“too big to fail” banks which are larger and more powerful
today than they were before the Meltdown of 2008. Those in government
are busy tightening down the screws in the name of “national security”
and the “war on terror.” There isn’t, of course, the
slightest reason to believe the sociopathocracy is interested in the
security of the American people, or they would have secured our border
with Mexico long ago! The above-noted legislation and executive orders
more than suggest that the “national security” state isn’t
worried about al Qaeda. It is worried about rising civil unrest among
U.S. citizens many of whom are awakening to what is going on, sometimes
from having studied how the superelite operates via Internet articles
like this one, or having themselves been targeted by cold and sociopathic
bureaucrats.
The
real question is whether and how freedom-minded and independent-minded
people can survive under sociopathocracy, while growing our numbers.
We are a threat to sociopaths in power, in that not only do we not simply
follow orders without question, more and more of us know who and what
they are. The sociopathocracy has tremendous resources at its disposal,
far more than any of us. Its denizens own the leviathan banking establishments
including the Federal Reserve. Arguably its hands control the upper
echelons of Hollywood and mainstream media. They dictate terms within
major universities, and lesser ones follow the trends—not to mention
their presence at every level within government schools.
http://www.newswithviews.com/Yates/steven152.htm